China's actions don't reflect its words

But China, which boycotted the meeting in Tunisia, has already indicated its opposition to additional sanctions, with its United Nations Ambassador Li Baodong saying that “sanctions, rather than help resolve an issue, often lead to further complications.”

This is not surprising since China had also opposed to the imposition of economic sanctions by the United Nations against other countries, such as Iran and Sudan.

Fu Ying, now vice foreign minister, explained China's position on economic sanctions in a major speech on China's relations with the West in October 2008 when she was ambassador to the United Kingdom. She said: “Economic sanctions and military force are not serious options in China's diplomatic toolkit. China will become strong, but never hegemonic.”

This position, which is at variance from that of Western countries, has been repeatedly stated by Chinese officials.

As a country that had been a target of Western sanctions after the Tiananmen Square military crackdown, it is understandable that China should object to such measures.

Unfortunately, this stated principle does not seem to be reflected consistently in Chinese actions.

Thus, the month after Fu's talk, China canceled the planned December 2008 summit with the European Union because of French President Nicolas Sarkozy's announcement that he would meet with the Dalai Lama.

Immediately afterward, China set out to punish France through economic warfare.

Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao toured Europe in early 2009 but conspicuously avoided France. The Chinese leader visited Switzerland, Germany, Belgium, Spain and Britain. During this trip, agreements worth more than US$2.2 billion were signed.

Premier Wen himself said: “I looked at a map of Europe. My trip goes around France.”

China also sent a buying mission to Europe. A delegation of 200 Chinese entrepreneurs, led by Commerce Minister Chen Deming, visited Germany, Switzerland, Spain and Britain — but not France. That trip resulted in contracts worth US$10.6 billion.

France could not take much more of this and, by April, it capitulated. In a statement it said it “fully recognizes the importance and sensitivity of the Tibet issue and reaffirms its adherence to the one-China policy and the position that Tibet is an integral part of Chinese territory.”

1|2|Next Page>>

SHARE CLOSE
Blogger		Google+
Live Journal		Plurk
Stumble Upon

Tweet

	PREVIOUS ARTICLE
	Russia retains firm stance in Syria crisis

NEXT ARTICLE
Local hospitality inspires visitors to stay

Write a Comment

Terms

Enter your comments - 3000 characters max

Type in image code

 Receive China Post promos
 Respond to this email

Submit